AishiSec Services
Source Code Security Review & SAST
Are there weaknesses hidden in your code itself?
Some weaknesses only exist in the code: in a function never reached through the interface, or a trust assumption buried in a helper. We combine automated source analysis (SAST) with manual review, because each catches what the other misses.
A source code review reads your application the way an attacker would: looking for the mistakes that matter, before they reach production.
What we test
Authentication and authorization logic: where trust decisions are made and how they can fail
Injection sinks: SQL, command execution, path traversal and the inputs that reach them
Hardcoded secrets: credentials, keys and tokens committed to the repository
Cryptography: weak algorithms, poor random generation and key handling
Input validation and error handling: what the application does with unexpected input
Unsafe patterns: deserialization, unsafe reflection and dependency misuse
How we test it
We agree the scope first: what to test, when, and what is off limits.
Testing combines manual work with automated tools and AI assisted analysis.
Every finding is verified by hand, with evidence captured for your team.
The weaknesses that matter
These are the kinds of findings this assessment is built to catch, each explained the way it would appear in your report.
CWE-862
Missing authorisation checks
A function assumes only admins can call it, because no check exists inside the code itself.
CWE-798
Hardcoded secrets
A database password committed to the repository, and now in every copy anyone has ever cloned.
OWASP A03:2021
Injection
Untrusted input reaches a database query, system command or file path without being checked: the kind of weakness that hides in code until an attacker finds it.
CWE-502
Unsafe deserialisation
Data arriving from a client is trusted in a way it shouldn't be, letting crafted input become executed code.
CWE-327
Weak cryptography
Sensitive data is protected with algorithms that are no longer strong enough, or keys that are handled carelessly. Once the data leaks, the protection dissolves far sooner than it should.
What you receive
Executive summary written for decision-makers
Findings with severity, business impact and evidence
Practical remediation guidance for your team
Retest results after fixes are applied
When to perform it
Before deployment, during major feature work, and after new developers join the team.
Who it's for
Teams that want weaknesses found and fixed early: before deployment, and before an attacker tests the same code from the outside.
Common questions
Know where your security stands.
Tell us what you're building, operating or protecting. We'll help you determine where security testing should start.